Late Blight Control – Date and Product Strategy Must be Correct!

Late Blight Control – Date and Product Strategy Must be Correct!

Germany, Bavaria; Bayerische Landesanstalt für Landwirtschaft

Institut für Pflanzenschutz; authors: Michael Zellner, Steffen Wagner, Bernhard Weber, Johann Hofbauer http://www.lfl.bayern.de/ips/landwirtschaft/12990/

 

This article (in English) provides very useful information and tables about the essentials in late blight control concerning the choice of product and the timing of the application. Tables of different fungicides, dates of application, a comparison of systemic and local fungicides are included. It explains the conditions for infestation, the function and modes of action of the fungicides. A selection of fungicides for first and later treatments is provided as well as optimum treatment frequency, dosage and prices.

Control of Colorado potato beetle (Leptinotarsa decemlineata)

This article provides a short overview on existing insecticides to control of Colorado potato beetle (Leptinotarsa decemlineata) in Germany.

For a successful control of Leptinotarsa decemlineata the timing of the treatment and the choice of the right product are essential. Treatment is most efficient at the time of larvae mass emergence (L1/L2) considering temperatures and using forecast models (such as SIMLEP).

In consideration of increasing resistance problems with pyrethroids and first appearance of resistance against neonicotinoids in Northern America strategies for resistance management need to be observed. The core element is using substances with different modes of action. The table displays insecticides and indications against Colorado potato beetle, aphids and aphids as vectors.

Potato late blight control (Phytophthora infestans)

This article refers Potao late blight control in Germany achieved in 2007. A strategy is offered recommending products with different modes of action in order to prevent resistance development.

High infestation pressure occurred in 2007 and occurred mainly on leafs. The recommended strategy is to use first systemic or partial systemic treatment at the beginning of the infestation ensuring the protection of the foliage. Products based on contact activity are well suited if infestation pressure is low.

Intensive treatment (Stoppspritzung) to eliminate infections showed very good results maintaining spraying intervals and recommended dosage. The following should be observed:

-         Spraying intervals max.5 days

-         Application of full dosage of products local systemic effects combined with a spore killing product (selection):     Acrobat plus WG 2 kg/ha + Electis 1,8 kg/ha

                                                     Tanos 0,7 l/ha + Shirlan 0,3 l/ha

                                                     Valbon 1,6 l/ha + Ranman 0,2 l/ha + 0,15 FHS

                                                     Infinito 1,5 l/ha + Shirlan 0,3 l/ha

-         For the following treatment a product with good efficiency and rain persistence should be applied

-         For the continuing and final treatment (8-10 days before haulm destruction) spore killing products should be applied.

 

In order to prevent development of resistance alternating use of active ingredients is essential. An alternation of the products Valbon (no spore killing effects) and Infinito (a.I.: Fluopicolide and Propamocarb) with a different mode of action provides a good resistance strategy.

Infinito provides an antisporulant and translaminar effects providing protection to the stem and the growing leafs. Depending on infestation pressure the recommended dosage varies between 1,2 – 1,6 l in 7-10 days.

The table in the original document presents a selection of in Germany approved fungicides.

Column 1= product name; column 2 = recommended (approved) dosage; column 3= active ingredient name; column 4= active ingredient concentration; column 5= mode of action; column 6= distance to surface water (m) and reduction of drift; column 7= sensitive area requirements; column 8= price.

Improvement of a diagnostic test to allow more precise localisationof tobacco rattle virus in fields

diagnostic-test-of-trv

Traditional bait tests take more than a month to complete and require vast resources. Targeted application with nematicide might be possible if the distribution of the virus were known using TaqMan technology.

Few satisfactory methods are available for the control of TRV infection. The current practice is to treat the whole field with nematicide should any TRV be identified. More targeted application might be possible if the distribution of the virus were accurately known. Existing methods of determining the occurrence of TRV rely either on counts of trichodorid numbers, which do not necessarily correlate with the presence of virus, or on detecting the virus in bait plants grown in samples of soil. Traditional bait tests take more than a month to complete, require large amounts of glasshouse space and are a significant cost to growers. A development of the bait test, now being offered through the Central Science Laboratory at York, uses real time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (TaqMan) technology to detect the virus in the roots of the bait plants. Another new diagnostic, developed at SCRI and available through SAC, uses improved nematode extraction systems and TaqMan technology to detect viruliferous nematodes.

Work undertaken for this project was based at three TRV infected sites in East Midlands (England), Angus and near Dundee (Scotland). All sites were growing cereal crops in 2004, which allowed easy weed sampling, and were planned for potato production in 2005. Weeds are in effect in situ bait plants that could be used as indicators of the presence of the virus. Work was therefore undertaken to compare the detection of TRV, using TaqMan technology, in the roots of weeds and of glasshouse-grown bait plants. Occurrence of virus would be mapped in detail within 2 ha sites using TaqMan molecular procedures both on the roots of weeds and (where applicable) of crop plants e.g. barley, and on conventional bait plants. In addition, the distribution of virus found in these tests was compared with the occurrence of spraing symptoms in a potato crop in the following year. Because nematodes and virus spread only gradually, mainly through soil movement (e.g. ploughing) or in the seed of a few weed species, knowledge of the distribution of TRV is likely to remain applicable for several years.

Prediction and manipulation of black dot development in potato crops

black-dot

The project examines factors influencing black dot development to help identifying crops at risk to reduce symptoms development through early harvesting.

One option for the management of black dot is early harvesting, which reduces symptom development. In order to select crops for early harvesting it is essential to know which crops are likely to be at risk by examining the factors influencing BD development. The research has shown that the ability to predict the risk of black dot occurring varies with potato variety. The methods of haulm destruction and the different storage conditions studied during the project did not effectively reduce the development of black dot.

Observations were made over 3-year study to try predicting black dot (BD) development on harvested tubers by assessing stems and stolons for the presence of the disease in 124 potato crops and related to the disease on the tubers at harvest. In some years significant associations were observed in some cultivars. In 2000 and 2002 in the cv. Estima if stems or stolons showed black dot symptoms as the crops were starting to senesce then the disease was likely to be present on tubers at harvest. In cv. Maris Piper a significant association between black dot on stems in September 1999 with disease at harvest was observed. No relationship between black dot on stems and stolons in the growing crop and disease on tubers at harvest were observed in the cvs. Saxon and King Edward. To explain these results a glasshouse and field experiment were performed to identify when symptoms of black dot develop on underground parts of a potato plant. These showed that infection by C. coccodes could occur soon after these plant parts had formed. Visual symptoms did not appear till just prior to senescence on stems and stolons and during senescence on tubers. Methods of haulm destruction and different storage conditions did not effectively reduce development of black dot on tubers. Reasons for this and its commercial implications are discussed.

Guidelines for preventing and managing insecticide resistance in aphids on potatoes

grower-advice-managing-insecticide-resistance

The guidelines apply primarily to the peach-potato aphid (Myzus persicae) as this is the aphid species with the most significant insecticide resistance issues associated with it.

Insecticide resistance is well-established in Myzus persicae but there is as yet no evidence of field resistance to insecticides in Macrosiphum euphorbiae. Resistance mechanisms can be divided into two main categories:

(a) Metabolic – pests with this type of resistance make increased amounts of certain enzymes which break down or ‘mop up’ insecticide molecules before they reach their target sites (these are primarily in the insect nervous system); in Myzus persicae overproduction of enzymes called esterases confers resistance primarily to organophosphates, although carbamates and pyrethroids are also affected to a lesser extent. (b) Target site – in pests carrying this type of resistance, a mutation occurs in the protein that insecticides normally bind to and inactivate, rendering them no longer sensitive to insecticidal effect; two target site mechanisms known to exist under this category in Myzus persicae: MACE (Modified AcetylCholinEsterase), which confer strong resistance specifically to some carbamates (Pirimicarb is the only insecticide approved in the UK that is affected by MACE resistance – Aphids are categorised as either MACE or non-MACE), and Knockdown resistance or kdr, which can arise through one of two genetic mutations, usually denoted as ‘kdr’ and ‘super kdr’ and are associated specifically with resistance to pyrethroids – Aphids are categorised as either kdr or non-kdr (kds).

Status of resistance in Myzus persicae: Aphids with high esterase, MACE and kdr were widely distributed on potato crops in eastern England in 1996, but with the exception of kdr, resistance levels then declined by 2000. However, MACE aphids resurged in central and eastern Scotland in 2001, and in the last five years MACE aphids have become more common in England. So far, there has been no indication in the UK or elsewhere of resistance to neonicotinoid insecticides including those used on potatoes (thiacloprid, acetamiprid and thiamethoxam). There is currently no evidence of resistance to pymetrozine or flonicamid in Myzus persicae.

Status of resistance in Macrosiphum euphorbiae: Field populations of this species have not currently demonstrated any practical resistance to any insecticide, but this may change since elevated levels of esterases have been detected in some individuals indicating the potential to become resistant to commonly used insecticide groups.

 

The Implications of resistance in Myzus persicae for aphicides approved on potatoes has been discussed. The report provides practical recommendations for potato growers based on Monitor chitting sheds for the onset of aphids, alternation of single products on the growing crop, number of application, type of products and their affectivity, important factors to bear in mind when making product selections, recommended products on seed crops that are least likely to harm beneficial insects, monitoring treatment efficacy, application frequency of insecticides and recommended rate.

Fight against blight: independent blight fungicide trials summary – years 2003 to 2005

report-fight-against-blight-independant-blight-fungicide-trials-2003-2005-summary

This report presents independently generated data on the effectiveness and technical attributes of blight fungicides.

The BPC commissioned ADAS & SAC to carry out field trials in 2003, 2004 & 2005, located at ADAS Rosemaund and SAC Auchincruive. Only two trials were carried out at each site in each year. The P. infestans isolates used were all recent isolates at the time from the UK. All trials were carried out on small plots of the variety King Edward. To make comparisons of all possible combinations would be prohibitively expensive therefore the work reported concentrated on two protocols:

Early season fungicides (Protocol 1): Evaluation of fungicides applied very early in the development of the crop.  Two new fungicides at the time, Sonata and Tanos, were compared with three established fungicides often used at the start of programmes, Dithane NT, Invader and Shirlan.

Main season fungicide evaluation (Protocol 2): The performance of fungicides applied from the end of rapid canopy growth was compared because most of the new fungicides are recommended for this growth phase of the crop. In addition, this would allow their effectiveness in controlling tuber blight to be evaluated. The new fungicides Electis, Ranman TP and Sonata, were compared with the established products, Curzate M, Invader and Shirlan.

The fungicides tested gave a similar level of foliar blight control. The trials provided strong data for the relative fungicide efficacies against tuber blight.

 

Strategies for minimising virus infection of potato crops

project-report-strategies-for-minimizing-virus-infection-of-potato-crops

This project report combines published information with the results from this work to provide a Decision Support System for minimizing PVY infection.

The project combines close collaboration with participating seed growers. It implements a system of within field aphid trapping and virus testing with complementary experiments designed to provide information to evaluate the risk of virus (principally PVY) infection and examine the merit of various testing strategies for crop management. The experiments were particularly concerned with evaluating the importance of mature plant resistance to PVY infection. The aphid species which have been shown to transmit PVY were given an efficiency index based on their ability to transmit the virus.

Aphid trapping can be a useful management tool for controlling PVY. In the two years prior to the date of this interim report, seed crops were burnt down promptly once a substantial rise in the ‘PVY index’ was recorded and in most crops either no PVY or a low incidence (1- 5 %) was recorded in post harvest tuber tests. The data obtained from these crops allows estimation of conditions which preclude substantial PVY spread but the absence of high incidence of infection limits the potential for modelling PVY ingress. Results from the virus movement experiment carried out over two years have been largely consistent. ELISA tests carried out on leaves and stems gave substantially lower incidence of PVY than the results from tuber tests. The incidence of infection in tubers was negligible for tubers harvested immediately after one week exposure to infection but one week later, infected tubers were detected and the incidence increased after a further week although to a lesser extent. The proportion of tubers infected tended to increase with increase in aphid index up to c. 50 but there was considerable variation in incidence of PVY in relation to aphid indices between exposure dates. Older plants had a lower incidence of infection than young plants, but even for old plants (exposed 6 weeks after emergence) up to 30 % were infected during weeks when the vector index was high. The differences in tuber infection between young and old plants confirms the importance of mature plant resistance for modelling infection in crops

Project report: Independent variety trials

project-report-independent-variety-trials-2005

Varietal performance for susceptibility to blight, black dot, black scurf, silver scurf, skin spot, common scab, powdery scab, blackleg, dry rot, potato cyst nematodes and other damages

To comply with national and European Community legislation for marketing seed potatoes, varieties must be placed on the official National List (NL) of a Member State, which is then automatically entered on to the Common Catalogue (EC National List). Part of the NL testing involves assessing a new variety for Value for Cultivation or Use. In the UK, this testing is largely concentrated on assessing varietal performance for susceptibility to diseases, pests and important tuber quality characteristics.

This 28-page experimental report describes tests conducted on 4 varieties undergoing their 2nd year of UK NL testing, 7 varieties which had completed UK NL tests and 5 Common Catalogue varieties. The above varieties were tested against foliage late blight, black dot, black scurf, silver scurf and skin spot. The Common Catalogue varieties were also tested for susceptibility to common scab, powdery scab, blackleg, dry rot, potato cyst nematodes, external (splitting) and internal (bruising) damages. The report presents a comprehensive summary that covers Project Aims, Work Undertaken and Findings (results on Susceptibility/resistance for 2005 are summarised in a table and rated on 1 (Low) – 9 (High) for resistance to disease, pest and defects) and conclusions.

Fungicide Resistance Action Group UK (FRAG-UK) Potato late blight: Guidelines for managing fungicide resistance

growers-advice-potato-late-blight-guidelines-for-managing-fungicide-resistance

This guide sets out actions to minimise the risk of resistance development to existing fungicides and new active substances for control of late blight.

The introduction in the late 1970s of the phenylamides brought a new dimension to blight control but there was a rapid development of resistance in the blight pathogen. This quickly brought about a change in the number of recommended applications. Of the current approved fungicides, resistance in Phytophthora infestans has developed only to the phenylamides, which was first identified in the UK in 1981.  The report provides information on the use of fungicide, the types and occurrence of fungicide resistance and how to reduce the risk of resistance developing in a pathogen population. A list of 12 fungicide groups, their mode of action and mobility, common name of active ingredient, product name, resistance risk and use is being presented. The Impact of new strains on fungicide use is also being addressed.

Managing fungicide resistance can be summarised as follows: where possible use a blight resistant cultivar, avoid growing large areas of highly susceptible cultivars, eliminate sources of blight (infected seed, ground-keepers and dumps), monitor local weather conditions, apply fungicides as protectants, select fungicides to suit local conditions, use mixed formulations of active ingredients with different modes of action or from a different fungicide families, or target specific products in blocks to appropriate growth stages, do not chase the epidemic with fungicides, burn off early if blight levels are significant and delay lifting until the haulm has been dead for at least 14 days.